Monday, February 13, 2006

This is a very quick post, as I'm running to the theater momentarily. But I want to thank everyone who has posted - I wish I could stop and respond to every entry.

I had a great weekend, just great. I got to read the last ten pages of Origin Of Species for Darwin's Birthday celebration at CFI West and I am so honored that I got to do that. I got to meet all sorts of old friends and new friends. I finally talked to Brian Flemming who did the documentary "The God Who Wasn't There." I watched his DVD this morning and it was sooo good, it really fired me up to work! Wow, what an excellent documentary. Everyone should see this.

Anyway, I had a fun show Sunday and I hope I have another fun show tonight. I worked on my Letting Go Of God? script all day. Yeah, you saw that right -- the question mark. I think maybe I'll just add the question mark.

I went to a dinner for this writer, John Hodgman, who has a new book out. I got to see a lot of dear old friends I haven't seen in a long time. And I got to meet Matt Groening, who is going to be at TED next week too. That rocks! I am beat and my eyes are glazing over from looking at a computer screen all day. I will blog more tomorrow. This blog thing rocks.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Did you get the idea for the question mark from Jared Diamond's "Collapse?" exhibit at the Natural History Museum?
Collapse? at the Natural History Museum (Closed)

Sheldon said...

I have to say that you sound a LOT more chipper and upbeat than you have in weeks past, Julia! I don't know you, but the Jewish Mother in me has been worried about ya. I hope you have a great show tonight, and I don't blame you at all for adding the "?" If that small change makes a few fence-sitting "Believers" wander in out of the cold and get a little enlightenment, then why not just add the little devil and be done with it?

Any further word on Randi, btw? I've been thinking a lot about him too, and so have my more enlightened Psychology students (dozens of whom are now hooked on reading your blog as well as Randi.org).

Anonymous said...

I don't think you really need the question mark. I guess in a sense, not having it sort of gives away the ending, but so what? The important thing is the journey, not the destination.

BAC said...

You could keep everyone guessing by calling it "going god" -- as in going, leaving, moving away. But, the unsuspecting would probably interpret it as going TO god --- which could bring them into the theatre.

Anonymous said...

There is a passage in Daniel C Dennett's new book Breaking the Spell where he writes "...O religious folks who fear to break the taboo: Let go! Let go! You'll hardly notice the drop!" I thought of you Julia. The title is not really that big of a deal. You write it, and they will come. My wife just finished reading "Genesis" and her eyes almost popped out of her head. Like you, it was not so much that she wanted to Let go as it Let go of her. You know the "Spell" So here we are The Bright's in a world of Our making.

Anonymous said...

For what it's worth: the question mark makes a robust and vital statement into something tepid. But oh how I'd love to see your show!

Steven Strauss said...

I don't think there's a thing tepid about the question mark. Ambiguity can have a few temperatures at once. And the question mark points to the aspect of the story that describes an inquiry, and as someone else here has noted, it invites an audience to ASK.

Your post ended with a very sweet but maddeningly vague affirmation: "This blog thing rocks." Can you describe what you were appeciating about the blog thing? It would clear up a lot. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

I read this quote over at Brian Flemming's website, and it completely encapsulates my feelings.

"It's because I take you so seriously that I can't bring myself to believe in you."

I, too, was raised Catholic, and seriously, so I completely understand the sentiment.

Anonymous said...

Hi
My fried went to see your stage thing for the second time, loved it.
I like the sensitivity of you blog, very engraciating--oh, is that a bad word?
My friend say I'm full of shit, but here it is...
"Eternity" is not after we die, nor before we are born. The universe is structured differently than that. The universe did not "begin" with a big bang singularity, rather that point is simply a boundry of a multi-dimensional object--only one dimension of which is time.
The bottom line is, we are objects fixed in four-space, not passing into oblivion as the present vanishes into the past.
Check out Stephen Hawking's views on the matter, or better yet, P.D. Ouspensky.
Thanks for entertaining my rant.
-sh